7 results for 'cat:"Trade Secrets" AND cat:"Business Practices" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Connolly properly denied the fabric manufacturer's motion to dismiss counterclaims brought by a solar shade maker in a copyright dispute over the weaves, patterns, and colors co-produced by the companies in their 30 year partnership. The solar shade maker's counterclaims sufficiently plead that the restrictive covenants in the parties' agreements were enforceable. Affirmed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Connolly, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 01744, Categories: trade Secrets, business Practices, contract
J. Kim partially grants the sued spinal implant manufacturer’s motions in limine against the suing spinal implant manufacturer. This dispute over two competing “expandable cage” spinal implant products that perform the same function will go to jury trial in January 2024. The suing manufacturer accuses the defendant of stealing its design. The court, on the defendant’s motion, bars the suing manufacturer from producing “ambiguous, misleading or new evidence of alleged trade secret misappropriation,” as well as making other claims about the defendant’s product. The court will allow other controversial materials and topics, such as the actions of the defendant’s parent company, to be brought up at trial.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Kim, Filed On: December 11, 2023, Case #: 1:19cv7092, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: trade Secrets, Interference With contract, business Practices
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Mahan grants the masonry marketing firm’s motion for summary judgment in this dispute arising from an alleged breach of contract brought by the masonry manufacturer. The manufacturer alleges the marketer solicited the manufacturer’s customers and claimed he was still working with the manufacturer when bidding for a contract with the Orlando Airport after the agreement was rescinded. The plain language of the agreement states that the marketer is free to perform other services for other parties and does not contain any provision restricting competition.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Mahan, Filed On: August 23, 2023, Case #: 2:19cv2213, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: trade Secrets, business Practices, contract